Another (better?) study on disk reliability?

Slashdot has a new article which says:

Google’s wasn’t the best storage paper at FAST ’07.
Another, more provocative paper looking at real-world results from
100,000 disk drives got the ‘Best Paper’ award. Bianca Schroeder, of
CMU’s Parallel Data Lab, submitted Disk failures in the real world: What does an MTTF of 1,000,000 hours mean to you? The paper crushes a number of (what we now know to be) myths about
disks such as vendor MTBF validity, ‘consumer’ vs. ‘enterprise’ drive
reliability (spoiler: no difference), and RAID 5 assumptions.
StorageMojo has a good summary of the paper’s key points.

See full article and interesting comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>